A Test of the Radiometric
am applying radiometric mechanics to
the "Encapsulated Radiometric Engine", patents summary by MIT and
The patent holders substantially increased the radiometric force/power.
The force/power generated is forming a pressure differential on "the
plates". As per the patent summary this pressure differential can be
maintained in a full atmosphere or above.
The force/power is generated in close proximity to the plates.
The possibility of inputting molecular energy into the macro motion of "a
vehicle" is apparent when the energy flow from near the molecular level is
diagramed in the transfer of energy to the "vehicle" macro motion.
In the patent summary  is indicated a large "plate"
mounted in the open air positioned over "a vehicle".
I noted the pressure differential takes place in close proximity to the
rotary motion is disclosed in these applications. ....The temperature difference
is maintained by means of efficient thermoelectric heat pumps integrated in the
Patent Images, Figure 6 and [0015 & 0031], comes closest in showing the
internalization of accelerative force in directing the internal radiometric
force/power to a drive shaft to which is then attached an external propeller.
I proposed the pressure differential of , the open air "plate",
could then still be maintained in a series of "plates" which would be
fully enclosed in a "vehicle". The radiometric effect would continue
to take place.
The patent developers focused on increasing the radiometric force to useable
means. My efforts focused on
applying, with a far smaller force, the mechanical properties I observed in my
workbench vacuum trial.
a series of plates permanently fixed to the interior of "a vehicle".
Although rigidly attached, the interior plates are still free to move - now as
an integral component of "the vehicle". Leave sufficient larger
openings around or in the plates for the recirculation of the de-energized gas
molecules. Apply, as in the technology of the patents, the
power source to the now fully enclosed internal plates.
a safety precaution, on the application of force/power, step to the side of the
"test vehicle". Upon the positive confirmation of the test, as the
"vehicle" is braked to a stop, promptly turn off the force/power to
avoid overheating the plates and/or pressure buildup inside the enclosure. I
would also have a few closed vents in the enclosure to open when necessary to
expel any excess pressure build up.
Simplifications - 1. The inertia of the "vehicle" serves as "the
base" to which would be directed the high molecular velocity,
small mass, of the molecules. Newton's physics enters here in the
interplay of inertia, mass, and the velocity of a small mass versus a larger
mass. In effect this would be the "gearing down" of low mass higher
molecular velocity to the slower velocity of a large "vehicle mass". I
also note when the weight of a larger mass is not excessive "a window"
could be open in applying the velocity of the smaller mass to overcome the
inertia of a larger mass.
The "vehicle" enclosure serves as the "drive shaft".
There would be no independent driveshaft with an external propeller. Thus
reducing the weight and increasing the efficiency.
The patents use "state of the art", to increase the
torque of spinning internal blades for additional force/power for an external
propeller. Yet an upper limit could be reached. At higher RPMs the more will be
the medium friction and the greater will be the required tensile strength of the
the test the full force/power will be directed to a "vehicle" - and a
rather small portion of the force/power generated would then be needed to offset
the exterior medium friction of the slower velocity of the macro mass of the
I ask: could the nano pores provide force/power with a lesser need for heat
pumps when the "vehicle" itself would be left free to travel? I ask
this question because the energy "flow" into the forward motion of
"a vehicle" would, in effect, be reducing both the interior
temperature of "the vehicle" and maintaining the pressure differential
as the energy continues to go into the forward motion of the
In asking this question I find myself "scratching my head" as to how
this could be? It just does not seem possible. Yet my sense this is because this
is a gap in understanding the application of radiometric physics. The test
addresses this gap by using the inertia of a larger mass as the accelerative
am confident the test will confirm this gap for then applying radiometric
physics (and avoiding "the bouncing ball oversight").
I am confident addressing this gap will contribute to the field of study
of radiometric physics.
for the Test
1. From my radiometer studies, I feel when "the parts" are "semi
attached" and when the force is applied over time that it could be possible
to contain the propulsive force within "a vehicle". Such a
"vehicle" would use the inertia of the vehicle itself as "the new
base" for the application of the radiometric force.
2. In this internalized mechanics, it is as if the force does not
"know" the outside" physics. The necessary physics and pressure
differential is taking place in and near the plates in applying power to a
"vehicle". The nano pores maintain the pressure differential by then
transferring the molecular momentum to the macro plate and "vehicle"
3. A key understanding is a pressure differential is maintained when the
"vehicle" is left free to
travel. The plates could be damaged by overheating if a "vehicle"
would be braked without reducing the power.
interesting point is the de-energized molecules only return to the new base
velocity of a "vehicle" itself.
4. The patent holders refer to "prior art".
In my 1999 web paper I diagramed the hypothetical internal propulsion of
a "vehicle". I continue gifting my insights of the internalization of
the radiometric force for general use, including that the radiometric force
could be kept within a "vehicle" to be directly applied to "a
5. I recall the very light weight, small strip dancing energetically down the
fixed rod of my radiometer trial from the minute force I was working with. In my
observing that small dancing, energized strip, I then realized the fuller
internalization of an accelerative force might yet be possible.
Upon A Positive Test Confirmation
The patents are respected. I could not ask this test without the work of the
In the patent summaries I find references to rotating devices, drive shaft, and
external propeller. It is as if the patents "revolve around" what I
feel is the "core" of what the patents are pointing to: the
application of an internal force/power to directly propel a "vehicle".
A Limitation in Classical Physics
classical physics one cannot use an internalization of an accelerative force as
the equal and opposite reactions cancel. The Newtonian limitation is: "the
parts" are fixedly attached. The equal and opposite reactions cancel.
I agree. (Note: although the test plates are fixed, the difference is the
plates are free to move with the "vehicle".)
radiometric force is near the molecular level and has a "fluidity" of
movement which is not in the fixed, attached "parts" of Newton's
physics. With respect to Newton's work, I would not include this limitation in
applying radiometric mechanics.
Newton's physics is also molecular motion in the form of gears and levers
and wheels and propellers. I feel radiometric mechanics would then underlie
Newton's "completion physics".
5. I am a novice with novice insight.
March 25, 2017 L. Thompson